Affirmative/Negative Burden:
- The affirmative has the burden to prove the validity
(well grounded or justified) of the resolution beyond a
reasonable doubt. In theory, absent clear and compelling
affirmative proof, the negative will automatically win.
The affirmative can fulfill this burden by establishing a
clear, logical case during their first speech; this is
called a prima facia case.
- Negative Duties: The negative has the duty to clash with
the affirmative's case; in other words, they must
systematically demonstrate how the affirmative fails to
met the burden of one or more of the stock issues.
- The affirmative establishes what will be debated during a
round, and the negative will show how the affirmative has
failed to prove their case.
Return to top
Return to main directory
1ST Affirmative Construction:
- Groundwork: As the
first speech, the 1AC establishes the groundwork for what
will be debated in the round. This is done by: providing
field context and legal definitions for key terms,
demonstrating the need for a change through significance
and inherency, present an outline of the affirmative's
plan, and discussing why the plan should be adopted by
outlining solvency and advantages.
- Delivery: Since
this speech is prepared long before the debate tournament
begins, the first speaker is expected to have most of the
speech memorized and to deliver the speech using superior
communication skills. The biggest problem with the 1AC is
being able to read, clearly, all of the information
within the eight-minute time limit. The more accomplished
in the 1AC the more time debaters will have to cover
other issues later in the debate.
- Cross-Examination:
Another concern for the first speaker is the
cross-examination period. First speakers sometimes think
they have the easiest job and tend to relax a little too
much. This weakness shows up when they are unable to
answer questions during the C-X period. The 1AC must know
everything there is to know about what they are reading.
- Duties of Other Debaters
During 1AC: 2AC - The 2nd Affirmative speaker will
not have much to do during this speech - just quietly
make any last minute preparations. 1NC - The 1st Negative
speaker will be quietly listening to the speech, pulling
evidence and arguments, and preparing for his first
speech. 2NC - The 2nd Negative speaker will be
attentively taking notes, called a flow, and preparing
C-X questions needed to clarify the affirmative's
position.
Return to top
Return to main directory
1ST Negative Construction:
- Groundwork: The
negative team must wait until the 1AC before they can
begin preparing their 1NC; what they say will depend
entirely upon the affirmative's case. At first glance
this may seem to be the most difficult speech, but it is
not for a team that has done their homework. The 1NC will
simply gather what evidence and arguments he has for that
particular affirmative and then attack each issue
one-by-one. The purpose of the 1NC is to show that things
are not the way the affirmative portrays them: that the
affirmative's plan does not address the topic, that
things aren't that bad, that the status quo is moving to
solve any minor problems, and that their plan will not
begin to solve the problem.
- Extra Duties: If
the 1NC has time, he will present disadvantages to
implementing the affirmative's plan. As a general rule
the 1NC will present between 8 and 12 complete arguments
against the affirmative's case.
- Duties of Other Debaters
During 1NC: 2NC - The 2nd Negative speaker will be
flowing the 1NC and preparing additional arguments and
extensions against the affirmative case. 2AC - The 2nd
Affirmative speaker will be quietly listening to the
speech, pulling evidence and arguments, and preparing for
his first speech. 1AC - The 1st Affirmative speaker will
be flowing and preparing C-X questions needed to clarify
the negative's position.
Return to top
Return to main directory
2ND Affirmative Construction:
Return to top
Return to main directory
2ND Negative
Construction:
- Groundwork: The 2nd
Negative speaker's duties are very similar to the 1NC
except that 2NC arguments: focus primarily on the issues
the negative thinks will actually win the debate, are
better developed and in greater depth, and focus
primarily on solvency and disadvantage issues.
- Extensions: The 2NC
will only extend arguments from the 1NC that are likely
to win the debate and require one or two minutes to
develop.
- New Issues: One of
the primary purposes of the 2NC is to present as many
well-developed attacks as possible. This strategy will
hopefully force the Affirmative to (1) drop an issue or
(2) be unable to adequately address all of the issues. As
a general rule the 2NC will present an additional 5
arguments against the affirmative's case bringing the
grand total to 13 to 17. Few affirmatives can handle this
many issues in a rebuttal.
- Dropped Issues? The
2NC will not be concerned with dropped issues - this
potential problem will be dealt with during the 1NR.
- Duties of Other Debaters
During 2NC: 1NC - The 1st Negative speaker will be
flowing the 2NC and preparing an outline of issues to
present in the 1NR. 1AC - The 1st Affirmative speaker
will be preparing an outline of issues and rebuttal
evidence to be used in the 1AR. 1NC - The 2nd Affirmative
speaker will be flowing the 2NC and preparing responses
that will be needed during the rebuttals.
Return to top
Return to main directory
1ST Negative
Rebuttal:
- Groundwork: The 1st
Negative speaker will present a basic summary of all
issues brought up during the debate. He will emphasize
the weaknesses of the affirmative's arguments and
illustrate why the negative team should win the debate.
This speech will not generally win a round but it can
loose a round. No new issues may be brought up in a
rebuttal. The debater may only discuss arguments brought
up during one of the four constructions. He may use new
evidence but not new issues. The 1NR must address all
issues. If he fails to discuss each issue, that issue may
not be brought up again and is lost to the negative. In
order to avoid this problem, the speaker should carry the
negative flow sheet to the podium and check off each
issue as he addresses it.
- Duties of Other Debaters
During the Rebuttals: Negative: The Negative
speakers will be flowing and outlining the rebuttals,
deciding which issues he will emphasize in the next
speech, and gather additional evidence that supports
their position. Affirmative: The Affirmative speakers
will be outlining the rebuttals and gather additional
evidence that supports their position.
Return to top
Return to main directory
1ST Affirmative
Rebuttal:
- Groundwork: The 1st
Affirmative rebuttal is perhaps the most dangerous speech
in the debate round. The 1st Affirmative speaker only has
five minutes to:
- address all 2NC attacks
in depth,
- point out all issues
dropped by the negative in 1NR, and
- briefly summarize all
issues brought up in the debate round.
- Collapse: Just like
the 1NR, no new issues may be brought up and no issues
must be dropped. The primary purpose of this speech is to
keep all issues alive and to weaken the negative as much
as possible.
Return to top
Return to main directory
2ND Negative
Rebuttal:
- Groundwork: The 2nd
Negative rebuttal will ultimately decide if the negative
will win the round. The major duties of the 2nd Negative
speaker include:
- deciding which
affirmative issues are still alive and dangerous,
- deciding which negative
arguments are weak and unlikely to help win the round,
- deciding which negative
arguments are strong and will help win the round, and
- deciding what additional
evidence and explanation is needed to strengthen winning
issues.
- Collapse: Negative
issues that are weak and unlikely to help win the debate
should only be briefly mentioned during the 2NR - this is
known as collapsing. Collapsing is important because
there is not enough time to adequately address all of the
issues in five minutes. Please remember that the negative
need only win a few good issues to win the round. The 2NR
should follow the format below:
- Point out all issues
dropped by the affirmative and ask the judge to flow them
to the negative side (If the affirmative dropped any
issues, the negative must point them out. This alone is
often enough to win the round),
- Briefly mention weak
negative attacks (You still should mention weak negative
issues for two reasons, (1) it looks bad if you drop any
issues and (2) the affirmative could use these dropped
issues to strengthen their position.),
- Provide a strong rebuttal
on any affirmative issues that are still alive and
dangerous (If the negative has failed to knock out
affirmative issues before this time, this may prove to be
a difficult task. Be sure to do as much work as possible
in earlier speeches.), and
- Spend the remainder of
the time emphasizing, explaining, and adding depth to
those negative issues that you feel will win the round.
Return to top
Return to main directory
2ND Affirmative
Rebuttal:
- Groundwork: The 2AR
is the most powerful speech of the round - it is the last
speech - this speaker has the last word. The major duties
of the 2nd Affirmative speaker include:
- deciding which negative
issues are still alive and potentially dangerous,
- deciding what additional
evidence is required to eliminate any negative attacks,
and
- deciding which
affirmative issues are strongest and should be
emphasized.
- Collapse: Unlike
the negative, the affirmative does not collapse. It is
still important that all stock issues be addressed. But
the affirmative may selectively emphasize his strongest
arguments. The 2AR should follow the format below: point
out all negative drops and ask the judge to add them to
the mounting affirmative evidence in support of the
resolution, provide any rebuttal evidence needed to
weaken strong negative attacks, discuss each stock issue
pointing out how the affirmative's position outweighs the
negative's arguments and how the affirmative has met its
burden, and emphasize the advantages of implementing the
affirmative plan. The 2AR is an excellent time to add the
emotional, persuasive elements to this speech.
- Special Note for Other
Debaters During 2AR: The only job the other
debaters have during the 2AR is to sit quietly and listen
to the final speech. Although anxious to pack your
material and move to the next round, you must be aware
that many judges, including myself, frown on debaters who
shuffle papers and move around during the final speech.
If you must pack your stuff, be sure that you are sitting
behind the judge where he cannot see you and that you do
not make any noise.
Return to top
Return to main directory
Speaker Etiquette During A Round:
Most judges will be high school teachers and coaches. They
expect debaters who are not speaking to be quiet and attentive.
They will not tolerate rude, crude, unruly, or disrespectful
behavior. DO NOT make off-the-cuff comments, roll your eyes,
sigh, or make other noises and movements that can be taken as
rude or in poor taste Even if the other team participates in such
behavior, such behavior from Shelbyville students is not
acceptable. Yes, I realize that many of your opponents are
idiots, morons, and crude - but we're above that sort of
behavior.
Return to top
Return to main directory