cxdebatelg.gif (18874 bytes) Constructing Arguments
ball.gif (950 bytes)
Argument Structure
ball.gif (950 bytes)
A Common Error
ball.gif (950 bytes)
Rebuttals
ball.gif (950 bytes)
Advanced Arguments

logo.gif (6216 bytes)

Argument Structure
How do I prove what I'm saying is true?

  1. Tagline: A label for the argument - necessary for identification and to be sure the judge records the argument on the flow.
  2. Evidence: Authoritative evidence that supports the assertion made in the tagline.
  3. Link: A brief explanation of how the argument is tied to the affirmative/negative position.
  4. Explanation: An explanation of how the evidence either supports your position or critigues your opponent's position.

Return to top
Return to main directory


A Common Error

A frequent error made by debaters is that they attempt to knock off a complex argument by simply presenting a single piece (or several pieces) of evidence. This might work 60 percent of the time. But when will it fail? - probably during a critical round, i.e. resulting in a 2/3 record and missing out on the final round. To correct this problem, debaters should develop all attack arguments using the complete structure.

Return to top
Return to main directory


Rebuttals

After the initial first presentation in a construction, a debater may choose to shorten the argument to (1) the original tagline, (2) a supplemental piece of evidence that rebuts the opposition's attack, and (3) additional explanation that clarifies the argument and demonstrates its superiority over the opposition. (In most cases, explanations in rebuttals will be longer than the original explanation.)

Return to top
Return to main directory


Advanced Arguments

Advanced debaters should attempt to develop even more complex argument structures. These arguments may contain several stock issues all linked together to formulate one contention. For example: (Please note that evidence citations are not present; you must have them in a debate.) Yes, conditions at one point were bad, but they have improved and seem to be at a point of resolution. Can we afford to interrupt the process? Chances are the status quo will help; chances are the affirmative will only hurt.

Return to top
Return to main directory


Previous part | Next part